lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aEBUgWdZtz8E_2d9@yury>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 10:13:21 -0400
From: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
To: Andrea Righi <arighi@...dia.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, David Vernet <void@...ifault.com>,
	Changwoo Min <changwoo@...lia.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/topology: Fix for_each_node_numadist() lockup with
 !CONFIG_NUMA

On Tue, Jun 03, 2025 at 10:04:02AM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:
> for_each_node_numadist() can lead to hard lockups on kernels built
> without CONFIG_NUMA. For instance, the following was triggered by
> sched_ext:
> 
>   watchdog: CPU5: Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP on cpu 5
>   ...
>   RIP: 0010:_find_first_and_bit+0x8/0x60
>   ...
>   Call Trace:
>   <TASK>
>    cpumask_any_and_distribute+0x49/0x80
>    pick_idle_cpu_in_node+0xcf/0x140
>    scx_bpf_pick_idle_cpu_node+0xaa/0x110
>    bpf_prog_16ee5b1f077af006_pick_idle_cpu+0x57f/0x5de
>    bpf_prog_df2ce5cfac58ce09_bpfland_select_cpu+0x37/0xf4
>    bpf__sched_ext_ops_select_cpu+0x4b/0xb3
> 
> This happens because nearest_node_nodemask() always returns NUMA_NO_NODE
> (-1) when CONFIG_NUMA is disabled, causing the loop to never terminate,
> as the condition node >= MAX_NUMNODES is never satisfied.
> 
> Prevent this by handling NUMA_NO_NODE explicitly in the exit condition.
> 
> Fixes: f09177ca5f242 ("sched/topology: Introduce for_each_node_numadist() iterator")
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@...dia.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/topology.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/topology.h b/include/linux/topology.h
> index cd6b4bdc9cfd3..095cda6dbf041 100644
> --- a/include/linux/topology.h
> +++ b/include/linux/topology.h
> @@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ sched_numa_hop_mask(unsigned int node, unsigned int hops)
>  #define for_each_node_numadist(node, unvisited)					\
>  	for (int __start = (node),						\
>  	     (node) = nearest_node_nodemask((__start), &(unvisited));		\
> -	     (node) < MAX_NUMNODES;						\
> +	     (node) < MAX_NUMNODES && (node) != NUMA_NO_NODE;			\
>  	     node_clear((node), (unvisited)),					\
>  	     (node) = nearest_node_nodemask((__start), &(unvisited)))

When NUMA is enabled, you add an extra conditional which is never the
true.

When disabled, I think this macro should not be available, or more
likely have a stub implementation, similar to for_each_node_mask()

Thanks,
Yury

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ