[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CY8PR11MB7134BFAE1A4E54EE0C539CCA896CA@CY8PR11MB7134.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 14:25:50 +0000
From: "Zhuo, Qiuxu" <qiuxu.zhuo@...el.com>
To: "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fabio.m.de.francesco@...ux.intel.com>, "Rafael J
. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Davidlohr Bueso
<dave@...olabs.net>, Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>, "Jiang,
Dave" <dave.jiang@...el.com>, "Schofield, Alison"
<alison.schofield@...el.com>, "Verma, Vishal L" <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
"Weiny, Ira" <ira.weiny@...el.com>, "Williams, Dan J"
<dan.j.williams@...el.com>, Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@...ux.ibm.com>,
Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@...il.com>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org" <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/4 v3] ACPI: extlog: Trace CPER PCI Express Error Section
> From: Fabio M. De Francesco <fabio.m.de.francesco@...ux.intel.com>
> [...]
> Subject: [PATCH 3/4 v3] ACPI: extlog: Trace CPER PCI Express Error Section
>
> I/O Machine Check Architecture events may signal failing PCIe components or
> links. The AER event contains details on what was happening on the wire
> when the error was signaled.
>
> Trace the CPER PCIe Error section (UEFI v2.10, Appendix N.2.7) reported by
> the I/O MCA.
>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Fabio M. De Francesco
> <fabio.m.de.francesco@...ux.intel.com>
> [...]
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_extlog.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_extlog.c
> @@ -132,6 +132,34 @@ static int print_extlog_rcd(const char *pfx,
> return 1;
> }
>
> +static void extlog_print_pcie(struct cper_sec_pcie *pcie_err,
> + int severity)
> +{
> + struct aer_capability_regs *aer;
> + struct pci_dev *pdev;
> + unsigned int devfn;
> + unsigned int bus;
> + int aer_severity;
> + int domain;
> +
> + if (!(pcie_err->validation_bits & CPER_PCIE_VALID_DEVICE_ID ||
> + pcie_err->validation_bits & CPER_PCIE_VALID_AER_INFO))
> + return;
> +
> + aer_severity = cper_severity_to_aer(severity);
> + aer = (struct aer_capability_regs *)pcie_err->aer_info;
> + domain = pcie_err->device_id.segment;
> + bus = pcie_err->device_id.bus;
> + devfn = PCI_DEVFN(pcie_err->device_id.device,
> + pcie_err->device_id.function);
> + pdev = pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(domain, bus, devfn);
> + if (!pdev)
> + return;
> +
> + pci_print_aer(KERN_DEBUG, pdev, aer_severity, aer);
Is there any reason not to use "KERN_ERR" log level?
> + pci_dev_put(pdev);
> +}
> +
Powered by blists - more mailing lists