[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1f719cfd-2c2b-4431-a370-290a865b0bf2@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 09:37:02 -0500
From: "Bowman, Terry" <terry.bowman@....com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Cc: PradeepVineshReddy.Kodamati@....com, dave@...olabs.net,
jonathan.cameron@...wei.com, dave.jiang@...el.com,
alison.schofield@...el.com, vishal.l.verma@...el.com, ira.weiny@...el.com,
dan.j.williams@...el.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com, bp@...en8.de,
ming.li@...omail.com, shiju.jose@...wei.com,
Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com, kobayashi.da-06@...itsu.com,
yanfei.xu@...el.com, rrichter@....com, peterz@...radead.org, colyli@...e.de,
uaisheng.ye@...el.com, fabio.m.de.francesco@...ux.intel.com,
ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com, yazen.ghannam@....com,
linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 03/16] CXL/AER: Introduce kfifo for forwarding CXL
errors
On 6/4/2025 1:01 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2025 at 12:22:26PM -0500, Terry Bowman wrote:
>> +static struct work_struct cxl_prot_err_work;
>> +static DECLARE_WORK(cxl_prot_err_work, cxl_prot_err_work_fn);
>> +
>> int cxl_ras_init(void)
>> {
>> - return cxl_cper_register_prot_err_work(&cxl_cper_prot_err_work);
>> + int rc;
>> +
>> + rc = cxl_cper_register_prot_err_work(&cxl_cper_prot_err_work);
>> + if (rc)
>> + pr_err("Failed to register CPER AER kfifo (%x)", rc);
> This shouldn't return rc;?
This was implemented to allow for native CXL handling initialization even if
FW-first (CPER) initialization fails. This can be changed to return rc.
Thanks for reviewing dan Carpenter.
-Terry
>
>> +
>> + rc = cxl_register_prot_err_work(&cxl_prot_err_work);
>> + if (rc) {
>> + pr_err("Failed to register native AER kfifo (%x)", rc);
>> + return rc;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> }
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists