lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202506042235.7e3a37da-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 22:51:17 +0800
From: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>
CC: <oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev>, <lkp@...el.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>, <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
	<oliver.sang@...el.com>
Subject: [linus:master] [btrfs]  8af94e772e: xfstests.btrfs.220.fail



Hello,

kernel test robot noticed "xfstests.btrfs.220.fail" on:

commit: 8af94e772ef7bede90895318a3fda6c68a652774 ("btrfs: remove standalone "nologreplay" mount option")
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master

[test failed on linus/master      7d4e49a77d9930c69751b9192448fda6ff9100f1]
[test failed on linux-next/master 3a83b350b5be4b4f6bd895eecf9a92080200ee5d]

in testcase: xfstests
version: xfstests-x86_64-e161fc34-1_20250526
with following parameters:

	disk: 6HDD
	fs: btrfs
	test: btrfs-220



config: x86_64-rhel-9.4-func
compiler: gcc-12
test machine: 8 threads 1 sockets Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4770 CPU @ 3.40GHz (Haswell) with 8G memory

(please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace)




If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202506042235.7e3a37da-lkp@intel.com

2025-06-01 10:11:00 export TEST_DIR=/fs/sdb1
2025-06-01 10:11:00 export TEST_DEV=/dev/sdb1
2025-06-01 10:11:00 export FSTYP=btrfs
2025-06-01 10:11:00 export SCRATCH_MNT=/fs/scratch
2025-06-01 10:11:00 mkdir /fs/scratch -p
2025-06-01 10:11:00 export SCRATCH_DEV_POOL="/dev/sdb2 /dev/sdb3 /dev/sdb4 /dev/sdb5 /dev/sdb6"
2025-06-01 10:11:01 echo btrfs/220
2025-06-01 10:11:01 ./check btrfs/220
FSTYP         -- btrfs
PLATFORM      -- Linux/x86_64 lkp-hsw-d01 6.15.0-rc6-00302-g8af94e772ef7 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Sun May 18 15:54:12 CST 2025
MKFS_OPTIONS  -- /dev/sdb2
MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/sdb2 /fs/scratch

btrfs/220       [failed, exit status 1]- output mismatch (see /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//btrfs/220.out.bad)
    --- tests/btrfs/220.out	2025-05-26 16:25:04.000000000 +0000
    +++ /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//btrfs/220.out.bad	2025-06-01 10:11:04.131877139 +0000
    @@ -1,2 +1,5 @@
     QA output created by 220
    -Silence is golden
    +mount: /fs/scratch: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdb2, missing codepage or helper program, or other error.
    +       dmesg(1) may have more information after failed mount system call.
    +mount -o nologreplay,ro /dev/sdb2 /fs/scratch failed
    +(see /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//btrfs/220.full for details)
    ...
    (Run 'diff -u /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/tests/btrfs/220.out /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//btrfs/220.out.bad'  to see the entire diff)
Ran: btrfs/220
Failures: btrfs/220
Failed 1 of 1 tests




The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at:
https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250604/202506042235.7e3a37da-lkp@intel.com



-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ