[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250605195018.539901-4-seanjc@google.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 12:50:17 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
syzbot+c1cbaedc2613058d5194@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] KVM: x86: Move INIT_RECEIVED vs. INIT/SIPI blocked check
to KVM_RUN
Check for the should-be-impossible scenario of a vCPU being in
Wait-For-SIPI with INIT/SIPI blocked during KVM_RUN instead of trying to
detect and prevent illegal combinations in every ioctl that sets relevant
state. Attempting to handle every possible "set" path is a losing game of
whack-a-mole, and risks breaking userspace. E.g. INIT/SIPI are blocked on
Intel if the vCPU is in VMX Root mode (post-VMXON), and on AMD if GIF=0.
Handling those scenarios would require potentially breaking changes to
{vmx,svm}_set_nested_state().
Moving the check to KVM_RUN fixes a syzkaller-induced splat due to the
aforementioned VMXON case, and in theory should close the hole once and for
all.
Note, kvm_x86_vcpu_pre_run() already handles SIPI_RECEIVED, only the WFS
case needs additional attention.
Reported-by: syzbot+c1cbaedc2613058d5194@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=490ae63d8d89cb82c5d462d16962cf371df0e476
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 24 ++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index c3cbcd9e39f6..9935307ad41f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -5487,12 +5487,6 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_set_vcpu_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
(events->exception.nr > 31 || events->exception.nr == NMI_VECTOR))
return -EINVAL;
- /* INITs are latched while in SMM */
- if (events->flags & KVM_VCPUEVENT_VALID_SMM &&
- (events->smi.smm || events->smi.pending) &&
- vcpu->arch.mp_state == KVM_MP_STATE_INIT_RECEIVED)
- return -EINVAL;
-
process_nmi(vcpu);
/*
@@ -11558,6 +11552,14 @@ static int kvm_x86_vcpu_pre_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(vcpu->arch.mp_state == KVM_MP_STATE_SIPI_RECEIVED))
return -EINVAL;
+ /*
+ * Disallow running the vCPU if userspace forced it into an impossible
+ * MP_STATE, e.g. if the vCPU is in WFS but SIPI is blocked.
+ */
+ if (vcpu->arch.mp_state == KVM_MP_STATE_INIT_RECEIVED &&
+ !kvm_apic_init_sipi_allowed(vcpu))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
return kvm_x86_call(vcpu_pre_run)(vcpu);
}
@@ -11906,16 +11908,6 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_mpstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
goto out;
}
- /*
- * Pending INITs are reported using KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS, disallow
- * forcing the guest into INIT/SIPI if those events are supposed to be
- * blocked.
- */
- if (!kvm_apic_init_sipi_allowed(vcpu) &&
- (mp_state->mp_state == KVM_MP_STATE_SIPI_RECEIVED ||
- mp_state->mp_state == KVM_MP_STATE_INIT_RECEIVED))
- goto out;
-
if (mp_state->mp_state == KVM_MP_STATE_SIPI_RECEIVED) {
kvm_set_mp_state(vcpu, KVM_MP_STATE_INIT_RECEIVED);
set_bit(KVM_APIC_SIPI, &vcpu->arch.apic->pending_events);
--
2.50.0.rc0.604.gd4ff7b7c86-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists