linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the block tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aEITcpq6tEAHegEN@kbusch-mbp>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 16:00:18 -0600
From: Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the block tree

On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 03:55:35PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 6/5/25 3:52 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Commit
> > 
> >   10f4a7cd724e ("nvme: fix command limits status code")
> > 
> > is missing a Signed-off-by from its author.
> 
> Sigh... That came from Christoph's pull today. Keith, can you just
> verbally sign off in here for that patch, at least then there's some
> sort of trail publicly available.

Sure thing:

Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>

Again for the record, it was in the original posting:

  https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvme/20250520202037.2751433-1-kbusch@meta.com/