linux-kernel - [PATCH 01/13] RISC-V: KVM: Fix the size parameter check in SBI SFENCE calls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250605061458.196003-2-apatel@ventanamicro.com>
Date: Thu,  5 Jun 2025 11:44:46 +0530
From: Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com>
To: Atish Patra <atish.patra@...ux.dev>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
	Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>,
	Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>,
	Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com>
Subject: [PATCH 01/13] RISC-V: KVM: Fix the size parameter check in SBI SFENCE calls

As-per the SBI specification, an SBI remote fence operation applies
to the entire address space if either:
1) start_addr and size are both 0
2) size is equal to 2^XLEN-1

>From the above, only #1 is checked by SBI SFENCE calls so fix the
size parameter check in SBI SFENCE calls to cover #2 as well.

Fixes: 13acfec2dbcc ("RISC-V: KVM: Add remote HFENCE functions based on VCPU requests")
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com>
---
 arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_replace.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_replace.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_replace.c
index 5fbf3f94f1e8..9752d2ffff68 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_replace.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_replace.c
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ static int kvm_sbi_ext_rfence_handler(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run
 		kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_incr_fw(vcpu, SBI_PMU_FW_FENCE_I_SENT);
 		break;
 	case SBI_EXT_RFENCE_REMOTE_SFENCE_VMA:
-		if (cp->a2 == 0 && cp->a3 == 0)
+		if ((cp->a2 == 0 && cp->a3 == 0) || cp->a3 == -1UL)
 			kvm_riscv_hfence_vvma_all(vcpu->kvm, hbase, hmask);
 		else
 			kvm_riscv_hfence_vvma_gva(vcpu->kvm, hbase, hmask,
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ static int kvm_sbi_ext_rfence_handler(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run
 		kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_incr_fw(vcpu, SBI_PMU_FW_HFENCE_VVMA_SENT);
 		break;
 	case SBI_EXT_RFENCE_REMOTE_SFENCE_VMA_ASID:
-		if (cp->a2 == 0 && cp->a3 == 0)
+		if ((cp->a2 == 0 && cp->a3 == 0) || cp->a3 == -1UL)
 			kvm_riscv_hfence_vvma_asid_all(vcpu->kvm,
 						       hbase, hmask, cp->a4);
 		else
-- 
2.43.0