linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] platform/x86: Move Lenovo files into lenovo subdir

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d6df0dcf-5786-0ad6-dd30-3a8c9f16426e@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 11:03:46 +0300 (EEST)
From: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@...ebb.ca>
cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>, corbet@....net, ikepanhc@...il.com, 
    hmh@....eng.br, W_Armin@....de, 
    Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, 
    linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, 
    ibm-acpi-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] platform/x86: Move Lenovo files into lenovo subdir

On Wed, 4 Jun 2025, Mark Pearson wrote:

> Create lenovo subdirectory for holding Lenovo specific drivers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@...ebb.ca>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
>  - Rebased to Linus's latest as requested
>  - Updated documentation reference
>  - Updated MAINTAINER file
>  - Removed X86_PLATFORM_DRIVERS_LENOVO as I was worried about
>    maintaining backwards compatibility for the distros.
>  - Removed 2nd patch in series splitting out hkeys. That will be for
>    the future

+# Lenovo x86 Platform-Specific Drivers
+# Lenovo X86 Platform Specific Drivers

Any possibility to be consistent in formatting that? :-)

Why does the admin guide contain a history book?? It should be guide for 
this version of kernel, not what was there in 2.6.x era ;-D. Please don't 
add to that any more, preferrably remove the history part afterwards in a 
separate change.

Other than those mentioned above, diffing per vs post seemed clean (I 
didn't check where the empty lines got added, Andy seemingly did already 
:-)).

-- 
 i.