[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250605102238.GA25350@nxa18884-linux>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 18:22:38 +0800
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....nxp.com>
To: Shawn Guo <shawnguo2@...h.net>
Cc: Laurentiu Mihalcea <laurentiumihalcea111@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>,
Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>, Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>,
Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tq-group.com>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/6] bus: add driver for IMX AIPSTZ bridge
Hi Shawn,
On Mon, Jun 02, 2025 at 12:09:02PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
>On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 01:19:16PM -0400, Laurentiu Mihalcea wrote:
>> Add driver for this IP. Since there's currently no framework for
>> access controllers (and since there's currently no need for having
>> flexibility w.r.t the configurations) all this driver does is it
>> applies a relaxed, "default" configuration, in which all masters
>> are trusted for R/W.
>
>Just out of curiosity, is there any ongoing/planned effort about creating
>a framework for access controllers at all?
I was planning to add a generic framework for access controller, mainly
for i.MX various parts for one SoC family. But I have not spent
much efforts on coding.
Regards,
Peng
>
>Shawn
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists