linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Documentation: cgroup: add section explaining controller availability

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9cf8f840-ff3f-4978-a454-9f2bba28c763@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 20:25:07 +0530
From: Vishal Chourasia <vishalc@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        bagasdotme@...il.com, llong@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: cgroup: add section explaining controller
 availability

On 05/06/25 15:15, Michal Koutný wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 11:13:53AM +0530, Vishal Chourasia <vishalc@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
>> +Availablity
>> +~~~~~~~~~~~
>> +
>> +A controller is available in a cgroup when it is supported by the kernel and
> +A controller is available in a cgroup when it is supported by the
> +kernel (compiled, not disabled and not attached to a v1 hierarchy) and
>
> Maybe this point about v1 exclusion. But altogether this section as
> drafted looks sensible to me.

I will add this.

Thanks,
Vishal

>
> Thanks,
> Michal