linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] selftests/mm: Fix test result reporting in gup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <077b6af0-bef3-4f1f-b785-9e351d01a89f@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 18:55:53 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
 Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
 linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] selftests/mm: Fix test result reporting in
 gup_longterm

On 05.06.25 18:42, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 05:26:05PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 05:15:51PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
>>> That's the thing with memfd being special and skipping on setup failure
>>> that David mentioned, I've got a patch as part of the formatting series
>>> I was going to send after the merge window.
> 
>> where did he mention this?
> 
> I can't remember off hand, sorry.

I assume in ... my review to patch #4?

What an unpleasant upstream experience.

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb