[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250607141106.563924-2-yury.norov@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2025 10:11:04 -0400
From: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc: "Yury Norov [NVIDIA]" <yury.norov@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] clocksource: Fix opencoded cpumask_any_but() in clocksource_verify_choose_cpus()
From: "Yury Norov [NVIDIA]" <yury.norov@...il.com>
cpumask_any_but() is more verbose than cpumask_first() followed by
cpumask_next(). Use it in clocksource_verify_choose_cpus().
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: "Yury Norov [NVIDIA]" <yury.norov@...il.com>
---
kernel/time/clocksource.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/clocksource.c b/kernel/time/clocksource.c
index 6a8bc7da9062..a2f2e9f4d37b 100644
--- a/kernel/time/clocksource.c
+++ b/kernel/time/clocksource.c
@@ -323,9 +323,7 @@ static void clocksource_verify_choose_cpus(void)
return;
/* Make sure to select at least one CPU other than the current CPU. */
- cpu = cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask);
- if (cpu == smp_processor_id())
- cpu = cpumask_next(cpu, cpu_online_mask);
+ cpu = cpumask_any_but(cpu_online_mask, smp_processor_id());
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu >= nr_cpu_ids))
return;
cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &cpus_chosen);
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists