lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250607064444.4310-1-pranav.tyagi03@gmail.com>
Date: Sat,  7 Jun 2025 12:14:44 +0530
From: Pranav Tyagi <pranav.tyagi03@...il.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
	André Almeida <andrealmeid@...lia.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: jann@...jh.net,
	keescook@...omium.org,
	skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
	linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linux.dev,
	Pranav Tyagi <pranav.tyagi03@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] futex: don't leak robust_list pointer on exec race

Previously, the get_robust_list() and compat_get_robust_list() syscalls
used rcu_read_lock() to access the target task's robust list pointer.
However, rcu_read_lock() is not sufficient when the operation may sleep
(e.g., locking or user-spaces access), nor does it prevent the task from
exiting while the syscall is in progress.

This patch replaces rcu_read_lock() with
get_task_struct()/put_task_struct() to ensure the task is pinned during
syscall execution prevent use-after-free.

Additionally, the robust_list pointer can be modified during exec()
causing a race condition if accessed concurrently. To fix this we
introduce down_read_killable(&exec_update_lock), a read lock on a
rw_semaphore protecting signal_struct members that change during exec.

This read-write semaphore allows multiple concurrent readers of
robust_list, while exec() takes the write lock to modify it, ensuring
synchronization.

This prevents an attacker from determining the robust_list or
compat_robust_list userspace pointer of a process created by executing
a setuid binary. Such an attack could be performed by racing
get_robust_list() with setuid execution. The impact of this issue is that
the attacker could theoretically bypass ASLR when attacking setuid
binaries.

Overall, this patch fixes a use-after-free and race condition by
properly pinning the task and synchronizing access to robust_list,
improving syscall safety and security.

Signed-off-by: Pranav Tyagi <pranav.tyagi03@...il.com>
Suggested-by: Jann Horn <jann@...jh.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/1477863998-3298-5-git-send-email-jann@thejh.net/
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/119
---
 kernel/futex/syscalls.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/futex/syscalls.c b/kernel/futex/syscalls.c
index 4b6da9116aa6..27e44a304271 100644
--- a/kernel/futex/syscalls.c
+++ b/kernel/futex/syscalls.c
@@ -53,31 +53,43 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(get_robust_list, int, pid,
 	unsigned long ret;
 	struct task_struct *p;
 
-	rcu_read_lock();
-
-	ret = -ESRCH;
-	if (!pid)
+	if (!pid) {
 		p = current;
-	else {
+		get_task_struct(p);
+	} else {
+		rcu_read_lock();
 		p = find_task_by_vpid(pid);
+		/* pin the task to permit dropping the RCU read lock before
+		 * acquiring the semaphore
+		 */
+		if (p)
+			get_task_struct(p);
+		rcu_read_unlock();
 		if (!p)
-			goto err_unlock;
+			return -ESRCH;
 	}
 
+	ret = down_read_killable(&p->signal->exec_update_lock);
+	if (ret)
+		goto err_put;
+
 	ret = -EPERM;
 	if (!ptrace_may_access(p, PTRACE_MODE_READ_REALCREDS))
 		goto err_unlock;
 
 	head = p->robust_list;
-	rcu_read_unlock();
+
+	up_read(&p->signal->exec_update_lock);
+	put_task_struct(p);
 
 	if (put_user(sizeof(*head), len_ptr))
 		return -EFAULT;
 	return put_user(head, head_ptr);
 
 err_unlock:
-	rcu_read_unlock();
-
+	up_read(&p->signal->exec_update_lock);
+err_put:
+	put_task_struct(p);
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -459,31 +471,42 @@ COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE3(get_robust_list, int, pid,
 	unsigned long ret;
 	struct task_struct *p;
 
-	rcu_read_lock();
-
-	ret = -ESRCH;
-	if (!pid)
+	if (!pid) {
 		p = current;
-	else {
+		get_task_struct(p);
+	} else {
+		rcu_read_lock();
 		p = find_task_by_vpid(pid);
+		/* pin the task to permit dropping the RCU read lock before
+		 * acquiring the semaphore
+		 */
+		if (p)
+			get_task_struct(p);
+		rcu_read_unlock();
 		if (!p)
-			goto err_unlock;
+			return -ESRCH;
 	}
 
+	ret = down_read_killable(&p->signal->exec_update_lock);
+	if (ret)
+		goto err_put;
+
 	ret = -EPERM;
 	if (!ptrace_may_access(p, PTRACE_MODE_READ_REALCREDS))
 		goto err_unlock;
 
 	head = p->compat_robust_list;
-	rcu_read_unlock();
+	up_read(&p->signal->exec_update_lock);
+	put_task_struct(p);
 
 	if (put_user(sizeof(*head), len_ptr))
 		return -EFAULT;
 	return put_user(ptr_to_compat(head), head_ptr);
 
 err_unlock:
-	rcu_read_unlock();
-
+	up_read(&p->signal->exec_update_lock);
+err_put:
+	put_task_struct(p);
 	return ret;
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_COMPAT */
-- 
2.49.0


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ