[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250608051810.3afc2d46@foz.lan>
Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2025 05:18:10 +0200
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] docs: kdoc: remove the
KernelEntry::is_kernel_comment member
Em Sat, 07 Jun 2025 07:22:51 -0600
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> escreveu:
> Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org> writes:
>
> > Em Fri, 6 Jun 2025 10:34:34 -0600
> > Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> escreveu:
> >
> >> entry::is_kernel_comment never had anything to do with the entry itself; it
> >> is a bit of local state in one branch of process_name(). It can, in fact,
> >> be removed entirely; rework the code slightly so that it is no longer
> >> needed.
> >>
> >> No change in the rendered output.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
> >
> > Not sure about this one. The idea of those warnings are to detect
> > non-kerneldoc markups that typically comes when someone "imports"
> > OOT drivers or Windows one into Linux.
> >
> > I remember I catched several such cases in the past with the help
> > of those warnings.
>
> I haven't removed the warning, just the use of that specific variable to
> trigger it.
After looking a the patch again, it sounds OK to me.
Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
Regards,
Mauro
Powered by blists - more mailing lists