[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <04556296-bcda-436f-b462-6b1718dafd00@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2025 19:34:11 +0200
From: neil.armstrong@...aro.org
To: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/meson: use vclk_freq instead of pixel_freq in debug
print
On 07/06/2025 00:10, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> meson_vclk_vic_supported_freq() has a debug print which includes the
> pixel freq. However, within the whole function the pixel freq is
> irrelevant, other than checking the end of the params array. Switch to
> printing the vclk_freq which is being compared / matched against the
> inputs to the function to avoid confusion when analyzing error reports
> from users.
>
> Fixes: e5fab2ec9ca4 ("drm/meson: vclk: add support for YUV420 setup")
> Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_vclk.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_vclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_vclk.c
> index 3325580d885d..c4123bb958e4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_vclk.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_vclk.c
> @@ -790,9 +790,9 @@ meson_vclk_vic_supported_freq(struct meson_drm *priv,
> }
>
> for (i = 0 ; params[i].pixel_freq ; ++i) {
> - DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("i = %d pixel_freq = %lluHz alt = %lluHz\n",
> - i, params[i].pixel_freq,
> - PIXEL_FREQ_1000_1001(params[i].pixel_freq));
> + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("i = %d vclk_freq = %lluHz alt = %lluHz\n",
> + i, params[i].vclk_freq,
> + PIXEL_FREQ_1000_1001(params[i].vclk_freq));
> DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("i = %d phy_freq = %lluHz alt = %lluHz\n",
> i, params[i].phy_freq,
> PHY_FREQ_1000_1001(params[i].phy_freq));
Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists