[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <DAI9L6TYQTEB.3M08GVEIDXTGR@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2025 21:54:24 +0200
From: "Benno Lossin" <lossin@...nel.org>
To: "Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@...nel.org>, "Alex Gaynor" <alex.gaynor@...il.com>
Cc: <rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>, "Boqun Feng" <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
"Gary Guo" <gary@...yguo.net>, Björn Roy Baron
<bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, "Andreas Hindborg" <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
"Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, "Trevor Gross" <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<patches@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] rust: init: re-enable doctests
On Mon May 26, 2025 at 5:29 PM CEST, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> Commit a30e94c29673 ("rust: init: make doctests compilable/testable")
> made these tests buildable among others, but eventually the pin-init
> crate was made into its own crate [1] and the tests were marked as
> `ignore` in commit 206dea39e559 ("rust: init: disable doctests").
>
> A few other bits got changed in that reorganization, e.g. the
> `clippy::missing_safety_doc` was removed and the `expect` use.
>
> Since there is no reason not to build/test them, re-enable them.
>
> In order to do so, tweak a few bits to keep the build clean, and also use
> again `expect` since this is one of those places where we can actually
> do so.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250308110339.2997091-1-benno.lossin@proton.me/ [1]
> Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>
> ---
> rust/kernel/init.rs | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Applied both to pin-init-next -- thanks everyone!
---
Cheers,
Benno
Powered by blists - more mailing lists