linux-kernel - Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v8 1/4] serial: 8250: fix panic due to PSLVERR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aEc-taZPSrO520ui@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2025 23:06:13 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: yunhui cui <cuiyunhui@...edance.com>, arnd@...db.de,
	benjamin.larsson@...exis.eu, heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com,
	ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com, jirislaby@...nel.org,
	jkeeping@...usicbrands.com, john.ogness@...utronix.de,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
	markus.mayer@...aro.org, matt.porter@...aro.org,
	namcao@...utronix.de, paulmck@...nel.org, pmladek@...e.com,
	schnelle@...ux.ibm.com, sunilvl@...tanamicro.com,
	tim.kryger@...aro.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v8 1/4] serial: 8250: fix panic due to
 PSLVERR

On Mon, Jun 09, 2025 at 03:44:19PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2025 at 09:18:02PM +0800, yunhui cui wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 9, 2025 at 6:10 PM Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 09, 2025 at 03:43:45PM +0800, Yunhui Cui wrote:

...

> > > - This looks like a new version of a previously submitted patch, but you
> > >   did not list below the --- line any changes from the previous version.
> > >   Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the
> > >   kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what
> > >   needs to be done here to properly describe this.
> > 
> > Can this issue reported by the bot be ignored?
> 
> No, why?  How do we know what changed from previous versions?  Otherwise
> we assume you just ignored previous review comments?
> 
> This series took at least 8 tries for some reason, might as well
> document it, right?  :)

+ many to what Greg said. The main problem you have is the absence of cover
letter, where it's naturally to put changelog for the series.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko