lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250609180628.3d7143bc@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2025 18:06:28 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: Prakash Sangappa <prakash.sangappa@...cle.com>,
 "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 "peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
 "mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com" <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
 "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>, "kprateek.nayak@....com"
 <kprateek.nayak@....com>, "vineethr@...ux.ibm.com" <vineethr@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 1/6] Sched: Scheduler time slice extension

On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 17:52:51 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:

> // Run with: GLIBC_TUNABLES=glibc.pthread.rseq=0 

You can ignore the above. I modified the rseq for my original version and
had to use a custom rseq that gcc didn't use. Although, since I was using
reserved bits, it probably didn't matter.

-- Steve


> 
> #define _GNU_SOURCE
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <string.h>
> #include <stdlib.h>
> #include <stdbool.h>
> #include <pthread.h>
> #include <unistd.h>
> #include <sys/time.h>


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ