lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250609224612.2428151-1-tanmay.shah@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2025 15:46:12 -0700
From: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@....com>
To: <andersson@...nel.org>, <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
CC: <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Tanmay Shah" <tanmay.shah@....com>
Subject: [PATCH] remoteproc: xlnx: allow single core use in split mode

It's a valid use case to have only one core enabled in cluster in split
mode. Remove exact core count expecatation from the driver.

Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@....com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
index 1af89782e116..f314dd5bdb26 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
@@ -1339,9 +1339,6 @@ static int zynqmp_r5_cluster_init(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster)
 	if (core_count == 0) {
 		dev_err(dev, "Invalid number of r5 cores %d", core_count);
 		return -EINVAL;
-	} else if (cluster_mode == SPLIT_MODE && core_count != 2) {
-		dev_err(dev, "Invalid number of r5 cores for split mode\n");
-		return -EINVAL;
 	} else if (cluster_mode == LOCKSTEP_MODE && core_count == 2) {
 		dev_warn(dev, "Only r5 core0 will be used\n");
 		core_count = 1;

base-commit: dc8417021bcd01914a416bf8bab811a6c5e7d99a
-- 
2.34.1


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ