lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250609-nolibc-stackprotector-robust-v1-1-a1cfc92a568a@weissschuh.net>
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2025 09:39:16 +0200
From: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
 Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>
Subject: [PATCH] selftests/nolibc: make stackprotector probing more robust

nolibc only supports symbol-based stackprotectors, based on the global
variable __stack_chk_guard. Support for this differs between
architectures and toolchains. Some use the symbol mode by default, some
require a flag to enable it and some don't support it at all.

Before the nolibc test Makefile required the availability of
"-mstack-protector-guard=global" to enable stackprotectors.
While this flag makes sure that the correct mode is available it doesn't
work where the correct mode is the only supported one and therefore the
flag is not implemented.

Switch to a more dynamic probing mechanism.
This correctly enables stack protectors for mips, loongarch and m68k.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile
index 94176ffe46463548cc9bc787933b6cefa83d6502..853f3a846d4c0fb187922d3063ec3d1a9a30ae46 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile
@@ -195,7 +195,10 @@ CFLAGS_sparc32 = $(call cc-option,-m32)
 ifeq ($(origin XARCH),command line)
 CFLAGS_XARCH = $(CFLAGS_$(XARCH))
 endif
-CFLAGS_STACKPROTECTOR ?= $(call cc-option,-mstack-protector-guard=global $(call cc-option,-fstack-protector-all))
+_CFLAGS_STACKPROTECTOR = $(call cc-option,-fstack-protector-all) $(call cc-option,-mstack-protector-guard=global)
+CFLAGS_STACKPROTECTOR ?= $(call try-run, \
+	echo 'void foo(void) {}' | $(CC) -x c - -o - -S $(_CFLAGS_STACKPROTECTOR) | grep -q __stack_chk_guard, \
+	$(_CFLAGS_STACKPROTECTOR))
 CFLAGS_SANITIZER ?= $(call cc-option,-fsanitize=undefined -fsanitize-trap=all)
 CFLAGS  ?= -Os -fno-ident -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -std=c89 -W -Wall -Wextra \
 		$(call cc-option,-fno-stack-protector) $(call cc-option,-Wmissing-prototypes) \

---
base-commit: 19272b37aa4f83ca52bdf9c16d5d81bdd1354494
change-id: 20250530-nolibc-stackprotector-robust-77c9f55a3921

Best regards,
-- 
Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ