[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <174945559319.2685.13353516764058471154.b4-ty@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2025 10:53:13 +0300
From: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <naveenkrishna.chatradhi@....com>,
Carlos Bilbao <carlos.bilbao@...nel.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>, Jake Hillion <jake@...lion.co.uk>
Cc: platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sched-ext@...a.com, Blaise Sanouillet <linux@...ise.sanouillet.com>,
Suma Hegde <suma.hegde@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] x86/platform/amd: better handle scheduling
delays in hsmp_send_message
On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 19:09:25 +0100, Jake Hillion wrote:
> hsmp_send_message currently relies in 2 places on the assumption that
> usleep_range will complete in well under 100ms. This is not guaranteed,
> and is prevalent when running sched_ext schedulers or possible under
> other high load conditions.
>
> These patches alter the behaviour in two ways:
> 1. Checks the result of `mbox_status` a final time if the sleep took us
> past the timeout. This gives a useful result under test when there
> are significant scheduling delays, rather than -ETIMEDOUT.
> 2. Removes the 100ms limit on awaiting the semaphore. This allows a
> second thread to compete even when the other suffers large scheduling
> delays.
>
> [...]
Thank you for your contribution, it has been applied to my local
review-ilpo-fixes branch. Note it will show up in the public
platform-drivers-x86/review-ilpo-fixes branch only once I've pushed my
local branch there, which might take a while.
The list of commits applied:
[1/2] x86/platform/amd: move final timeout check to after final sleep
commit: f8afb12a2d7503de6558c23cacd7acbf6e9fe678
[2/2] x86/platform/amd: replace down_timeout with down_interruptible
commit: 784e48a82976ee0b645788750343cd1b28a372f3
--
i.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists