linux-kernel - [PATCH v6 09/10] mm,mempolicy: Use node-notifier instead of memory-notifier

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250609092149.312114-10-osalvador@suse.de>
Date: Mon,  9 Jun 2025 11:21:46 +0200
From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
	Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>,
	Rakie Kim <rakie.kim@...com>,
	Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>,
	Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@...il.com>,
	linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
Subject: [PATCH v6 09/10] mm,mempolicy: Use node-notifier instead of memory-notifier

mempolicy is only concerned when a numa node changes its memory state,
because it needs to take this node into account for the auto-weighted
memory policy system.
So stop using the memory notifier and use the new numa node notifer
instead.

Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Reviewed-by: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>
Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Reviewed-by: Rakie Kim <rakie.kim@...com>
---
 mm/mempolicy.c | 13 +++++--------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
index 72fd72e156b1..693319c2652d 100644
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -3793,20 +3793,17 @@ static int wi_node_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
 			       unsigned long action, void *data)
 {
 	int err;
-	struct memory_notify *arg = data;
-	int nid = arg->status_change_nid;
-
-	if (nid < 0)
-		return NOTIFY_OK;
+	struct node_notify *nn = data;
+	int nid = nn->nid;
 
 	switch (action) {
-	case MEM_ONLINE:
+	case NODE_ADDED_FIRST_MEMORY:
 		err = sysfs_wi_node_add(nid);
 		if (err)
 			pr_err("failed to add sysfs for node%d during hotplug: %d\n",
 			       nid, err);
 		break;
-	case MEM_OFFLINE:
+	case NODE_REMOVED_LAST_MEMORY:
 		sysfs_wi_node_delete(nid);
 		break;
 	}
@@ -3845,7 +3842,7 @@ static int __init add_weighted_interleave_group(struct kobject *mempolicy_kobj)
 		}
 	}
 
-	hotplug_memory_notifier(wi_node_notifier, DEFAULT_CALLBACK_PRI);
+	hotplug_node_notifier(wi_node_notifier, DEFAULT_CALLBACK_PRI);
 	return 0;
 
 err_cleanup_kobj:
-- 
2.49.0