[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2806486.NG923GbCHz@phil>
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2025 11:56:54 +0200
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Quentin Schulz <foss+kernel@...il.net>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@...rry.de>
Subject:
Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: support camera module on Haikou Video Demo
on PX30 Ringneck
Hi Quentin,
Am Freitag, 16. Mai 2025, 19:26:10 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieb Quentin Schulz:
> +&isp {
> + status = "okay";
> +
> + ports {
> + port@0 {
> + mipi_in_cam: endpoint@0 {
> + reg = <0>;
> + data-lanes = <1 2>;
> + remote-endpoint = <&cam_out>;
> + };
> + };
> + };
> };
dtc is quite unhappy about this construct ;-) .
with a W=1 build option when compiling DTBs we end up with a number
of complaints about missing and/or unneeded address-cells/size-cells
or "only one endpoint, @0 not necessary".
I think it would make sense to give the isp port a phandle in the
px30.dtsi and reference that one here - similar to how the dsi-panel
works.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists