linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] clocksource: Fix opencoded cpumask_any_but() in clocksource_verify_choose

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aEbwsyJyqm7WYJkJ@yury>
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2025 10:33:23 -0400
From: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] clocksource: Fix opencoded cpumask_any_but() in
 clocksource_verify_choose_cpus()

On Mon, Jun 09, 2025 at 12:03:23PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 07 2025 at 10:11, Yury Norov wrote:
> 
> Why are you so obsessed to slap 'Fix' on every subject line?
> 
> This fixes absolutely nothing at all.

Opencoding helpers is an error, isn't? That's why 'fix'.
 
> All it does is to replace a open coded sequence by appropriate
> function. So describe the changes accurately.

I'm not attached to words. If you prefer 'replace', I can resend with
the wording you like. Please advise.

Thanks,
Yury