lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <28d7d9c2-8498-41a7-ab37-821d574fbb2a@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2025 22:56:09 +0800
From: Yongbang Shi <shiyongbang@...wei.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
CC: <xinliang.liu@...aro.org>, <tiantao6@...ilicon.com>,
	<maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, <mripard@...nel.org>,
	<tzimmermann@...e.de>, <airlied@...il.com>, <daniel@...ll.ch>,
	<kong.kongxinwei@...ilicon.com>, <liangjian010@...wei.com>,
	<chenjianmin@...wei.com>, <lidongming5@...wei.com>, <libaihan@...wei.com>,
	<shenjian15@...wei.com>, <shaojijie@...wei.com>,
	<jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>, <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <shiyongbang@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH drm-dp 05/10] drm/hisilicon/hibmc: fix rare monitors
 cannot display problem


> On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 05:54:27PM +0800, Yongbang Shi wrote:
>> From: Baihan Li <libaihan@...wei.com>
>>
>> DP Link training successful at 8.1Gbps with some monitors' max link rate
>> are 2.7Gbps. So change the default 8.1Gbps link rate to the rate that reads
>> from devices' capabilities.
> I've hard time understanding this message.

Sorry for misunderstanding. The problem is that dp link training success at 8.1Gbps, however,

the sink 's maximum supported rate is less than 8.1G.


>> Fixes: f9698f802e50 ("drm/hisilicon/hibmc: Restructuring the header dp_reg.h")
> No, the tag is incorrect. Mentioned commit is not related.

Ok.


>> Signed-off-by: Baihan Li <libaihan@...wei.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/dp/dp_comm.h  |  4 ++-
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/dp/dp_hw.c    |  6 +---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/dp/dp_link.c  | 33 +++++++++++++------
>>   .../gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/dp/dp_serdes.c    | 12 -------
>>   4 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/dp/dp_serdes.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/dp/dp_serdes.c
>> index 676059d4c1e6..8191233aa965 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/dp/dp_serdes.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/dp/dp_serdes.c
>> @@ -57,15 +57,3 @@ int hibmc_dp_serdes_rate_switch(u8 rate, struct hibmc_dp_dev *dp)
>>   
>>   	return 0;
>>   }
>> -
>> -int hibmc_dp_serdes_init(struct hibmc_dp_dev *dp)
>> -{
>> -	dp->serdes_base = dp->base + HIBMC_DP_HOST_OFFSET;
>> -
>> -	writel(FIELD_PREP(HIBMC_DP_PMA_TXDEEMPH, DP_SERDES_VOL0_PRE0),
>> -	       dp->serdes_base + HIBMC_DP_PMA_LANE0_OFFSET);
>> -	writel(FIELD_PREP(HIBMC_DP_PMA_TXDEEMPH, DP_SERDES_VOL0_PRE0),
>> -	       dp->serdes_base + HIBMC_DP_PMA_LANE1_OFFSET);
> Where did these two writes go?

It's the same as the cfg in hibmc_dp_serdes_set_tx_cfg(), and this function will be called certainly.


>> -
>> -	return hibmc_dp_serdes_rate_switch(DP_SERDES_BW_8_1, dp);
>> -}
>> -- 
>> 2.33.0
>>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ