[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aEcLIGNPZZMOZVtz@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2025 06:26:08 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Andrea Righi <arighi@...dia.com>
Cc: David Vernet <void@...ifault.com>, Changwoo Min <changwoo@...lia.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] sched_ext: Improve code modularization
On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 04:33:10PM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:
> Despite the unusual structure of the scheduler code, where the source code
> of all scheduler classes is included in a single .c file, we should still
> structure the code as if each .c file were a standalone build unit. This
> means marking internal functions as static, declaring shared symbols via
> proper function prototypes in a header file, etc.
>
> This patch series is a first step toward such cleanup for the sched_ext
> code. There is more work to do, but these changes are intentionally small
> to minimize potential disruption to the ongoing development, laying some
> groundwork for a cleaner and more maintainable code.
>
> Andrea Righi (4):
> sched_ext: idle: Remove unnecessary ifdef in scx_bpf_cpu_node()
> sched_ext: idle: Make local functions static in ext_idle.c
> sched_ext: Make scx_rq_bypassing() inline
> sched_ext: Make scx_locked_rq() shared
Applied to sched_ext/for-6.17.
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists