[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250609164320.GM8020@e132581.arm.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2025 17:43:20 +0100
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@....com>
To: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Cc: Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
coresight@...ts.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/9] coresight: Appropriately disable trace bus clocks
On Mon, Jun 09, 2025 at 05:14:09PM +0100, Suzuki Kuruppassery Poulose wrote:
> On 09/06/2025 17:00, Leo Yan wrote:
> > Some CoreSight components have trace bus clocks 'atclk' and are enabled
> > using clk_prepare_enable(). These clocks are not disabled when modules
> > exit.
> >
> > As atclk is optional, use devm_clk_get_optional_enabled() to manage it.
> > The benefit is the driver model layer can automatically disable and
> > release clocks.
> >
> > Check the returned value with IS_ERR() to detect errors but leave the
> > NULL pointer case if the clock is not found. And remove the error
> > handling codes which are no longer needed.
> >
> > Fixes: d1839e687773 ("coresight: etm: retrieve and handle atclk")
> > Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
> > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@....com>
>
> Can we consolidate the ATCLK handling to the core coresight helper for
> APB clocks ? It is an optional clock for all devices anyways ?
Yes. ATCLK is always optional.
Could you check the patch 07? It is exactly a consolidation to put ATCLK
and APB clocks into a central place.
Thanks,
Leo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists