[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aEg0K1OE6zhL97me@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 16:33:31 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@...ebb.ca>
Cc: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, ikepanhc@...il.com,
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>,
Armin Wolf <W_Armin@....de>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
"platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org" <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
ibm-acpi-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] platform/x86: thinklmi: improved DMI handling
On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 08:28:49AM -0400, Mark Pearson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2025, at 3:35 AM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > On Mon, 9 Jun 2025, Mark Pearson wrote:
...
> >> + serial = dmi_get_system_info(DMI_PRODUCT_SERIAL);
> >> + if (!serial)
> >> + return -EINVAL;
> >
> > This should not return -EINVAL as it is not a problem with the input
> > parameters. Perhaps -ENODEV would make sense instead?
>
> Good point.
> Unless Andy strongly thinks I should drop this bit, I'll fix in the next version
If maintainers are okay to take this approach (both Kconfig and C file
changes), I am fine.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists