[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8f15a5d6-0f73-194a-8fa2-b7ba8cc8c5b2@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 15:50:53 +0200 (CEST)
From: Sebastian Ott <sebott@...hat.com>
To: Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@...cle.com>
cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@...gle.com>,
Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@...gle.com>, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev" <kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] KVM: arm64: selftests: arch_timer_edge_cases
fixes
Hej Miguel,
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025, Miguel Luis wrote:
>> On 5 Jun 2025, at 10:36, Sebastian Ott <sebott@...hat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Some small fixes for arch_timer_edge_cases that I stumbled upon
>> while debugging failures for this selftest on ampere-one.
>>
>
> I’ve tested this test under three circumstances:
>
> 1) Original (!HAS_EL2 && !HAS_EL2_E2H0)
>
> 2) HAS_EL2 && HAS_EL2_E2H0
>
> 3) HAS_EL2 && !HAS_EL2_E2H0
>
> Tests 1) and 2) returned in approx. the same amount of real time (about 12s) although 3) doesn’t
> seem to return at all.
I've never really looked at nested stuff, I'll try to set smth up and see
if I can reproduce that..
Thanks,
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists