[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d289f57c-55dd-40cc-a4bb-8359ee61e8c9@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 10:11:03 +0530
From: Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, willy@...radead.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, david@...hat.com, anshuman.khandual@....com,
ryan.roberts@....com, ziy@...dia.com, aneesh.kumar@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xarray: Add a BUG_ON() to ensure caller is not sibling
On 04/06/25 9:45 am, Dev Jain wrote:
> Suppose xas is pointing somewhere near the end of the multi-entry batch.
> Then it may happen that the computed slot already falls beyond the batch,
> thus breaking the loop due to !xa_is_sibling(), and computing the wrong
> order. For example, suppose we have a shift-6 node having an order-9
> entry => 8 - 1 = 7 siblings, so assume the slots are at offset 0 till 7 in
> this node. If xas->xa_offset is 6, then the code will compute order as
> 1 + xas->xa_node->shift = 7. Therefore, the order computation must start
> from the beginning of the multi-slot entries, that is, the non-sibling
> entry. Thus ensure that the caller is aware of this by triggering a BUG
> when the entry is a sibling entry. Note that this BUG_ON() is only
> active while running selftests, so there is no overhead in a running
> kernel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>
> ---
Gentle ping, is anything else required from my side.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists