lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1da1e7db-c091-44b0-b466-cb8aaa6431ff@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 14:10:46 -0400
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
To: Sergey Bashirov <sergeybashirov@...il.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>, NeilBrown <neil@...wn.name>,
        Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@...hat.com>, Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@...cle.com>,
        Tom Talpey <tom@...pey.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Konstantin Evtushenko <koevtushenko@...dex.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] nfsd: Implement large extent array support in pNFS

On 6/9/25 9:18 PM, Sergey Bashirov wrote:
> When pNFS client in block layout mode sends layoutcommit RPC to MDS,
> a variable length array of modified extents is supplied within request.
> This patch allows NFS server to accept such extent arrays if they do not
> fit within single memory page.
> 
> The issue can be reproduced when writing to a 1GB file using FIO with small
> block size and large I/O depth. Server returns NFSERR_BADXDR to the client.
> 
> Co-developed-by: Konstantin Evtushenko <koevtushenko@...dex.com>
> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Evtushenko <koevtushenko@...dex.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sergey Bashirov <sergeybashirov@...il.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
>  - Drop the len argument in *_decode_layoutupdate()
>  - Remove lc_up_len field from nfsd4_layoutcommit structure
>  - Fix code formatting
> 
>  fs/nfsd/blocklayout.c    |  8 ++--
>  fs/nfsd/blocklayoutxdr.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  fs/nfsd/blocklayoutxdr.h |  8 ++--
>  fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c        | 11 +++--
>  fs/nfsd/xdr4.h           |  3 +-
>  5 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/blocklayout.c b/fs/nfsd/blocklayout.c
> index 08a20e5bcf7f..e74c3a19aeb9 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/blocklayout.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/blocklayout.c
> @@ -179,8 +179,8 @@ nfsd4_block_proc_layoutcommit(struct inode *inode,
>  	struct iomap *iomaps;
>  	int nr_iomaps;
>  
> -	nr_iomaps = nfsd4_block_decode_layoutupdate(lcp->lc_up_layout,
> -			lcp->lc_up_len, &iomaps, i_blocksize(inode));
> +	nr_iomaps = nfsd4_block_decode_layoutupdate(&lcp->lc_up_layout,
> +			&iomaps, i_blocksize(inode));
>  	if (nr_iomaps < 0)
>  		return nfserrno(nr_iomaps);
>  
> @@ -317,8 +317,8 @@ nfsd4_scsi_proc_layoutcommit(struct inode *inode,
>  	struct iomap *iomaps;
>  	int nr_iomaps;
>  
> -	nr_iomaps = nfsd4_scsi_decode_layoutupdate(lcp->lc_up_layout,
> -			lcp->lc_up_len, &iomaps, i_blocksize(inode));
> +	nr_iomaps = nfsd4_scsi_decode_layoutupdate(&lcp->lc_up_layout,
> +			&iomaps, i_blocksize(inode));
>  	if (nr_iomaps < 0)
>  		return nfserrno(nr_iomaps);
>  
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/blocklayoutxdr.c b/fs/nfsd/blocklayoutxdr.c
> index ce78f74715ee..b76dbb119e19 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/blocklayoutxdr.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/blocklayoutxdr.c
> @@ -113,26 +113,27 @@ nfsd4_block_encode_getdeviceinfo(struct xdr_stream *xdr,
>  }
>  
>  int
> -nfsd4_block_decode_layoutupdate(__be32 *p, u32 len, struct iomap **iomapp,
> +nfsd4_block_decode_layoutupdate(struct xdr_buf *buf, struct iomap **iomapp,
>  		u32 block_size)
>  {
>  	struct iomap *iomaps;
> -	u32 nr_iomaps, i;
> +	u32 nr_iomaps, expected, len, i;
> +	struct xdr_stream xdr;
> +	char scratch[sizeof(struct pnfs_block_extent)];

Using "sizeof(struct yada)" for an XDR decoding buffer is incorrect.

struct pnfs_block_extent is a C structure, with padding and
architecture-dependent field sizes. It does not represent the size of
the XDR data items on the wire.


> -	if (len < sizeof(u32)) {
> -		dprintk("%s: extent array too small: %u\n", __func__, len);
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -	}
> -	len -= sizeof(u32);
> -	if (len % PNFS_BLOCK_EXTENT_SIZE) {
> -		dprintk("%s: extent array invalid: %u\n", __func__, len);
> +	xdr_init_decode(&xdr, buf, buf->head[0].iov_base, NULL);
> +	xdr_set_scratch_buffer(&xdr, scratch, sizeof(scratch));

Consider using svcxdr_init_decode() instead.


> +
> +	if (xdr_stream_decode_u32(&xdr, &nr_iomaps)) {
> +		dprintk("%s: failed to decode extent array size\n", __func__);
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}

Throughout, please drop the dprintk's. At least don't add any new
ones.

I find the use of -EINVAL to signal an XDR decoding error to be somewhat
inappropriate, but I guess it's historical (ie, its usage is not
introduced by your patch). I would have expected perhaps NFS4ERR_BADXDR.
Perhaps that should be corrected in a prerequisite patch.

NFS4ERR_EINVAL means the server was able to decode the request but the
decoded values are invalid. Here, the decoding has failed, and that's
really a different problem.


> -	nr_iomaps = be32_to_cpup(p++);
> -	if (nr_iomaps != len / PNFS_BLOCK_EXTENT_SIZE) {
> +	len = sizeof(__be32) + xdr_stream_remaining(&xdr);
> +	expected = sizeof(__be32) + nr_iomaps * PNFS_BLOCK_EXTENT_SIZE;
> +	if (len != expected) {
>  		dprintk("%s: extent array size mismatch: %u/%u\n",
> -			__func__, len, nr_iomaps);
> +			__func__, len, expected);
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -144,29 +145,54 @@ nfsd4_block_decode_layoutupdate(__be32 *p, u32 len, struct iomap **iomapp,
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < nr_iomaps; i++) {
>  		struct pnfs_block_extent bex;
> +		ssize_t ret;
>  
> -		memcpy(&bex.vol_id, p, sizeof(struct nfsd4_deviceid));
> -		p += XDR_QUADLEN(sizeof(struct nfsd4_deviceid));
> +		ret = xdr_stream_decode_opaque_fixed(&xdr,
> +				&bex.vol_id, sizeof(bex.vol_id));
> +		if (ret < sizeof(bex.vol_id)) {
> +			dprintk("%s: failed to decode device id for entry %u\n",
> +				__func__, i);
> +			goto fail;
> +		}
>  
> -		p = xdr_decode_hyper(p, &bex.foff);
> +		if (xdr_stream_decode_u64(&xdr, &bex.foff)) {
> +			dprintk("%s: failed to decode offset for entry %u\n",
> +				__func__, i);
> +			goto fail;
> +		}
>  		if (bex.foff & (block_size - 1)) {
>  			dprintk("%s: unaligned offset 0x%llx\n",
>  				__func__, bex.foff);
>  			goto fail;
>  		}
> -		p = xdr_decode_hyper(p, &bex.len);
> +
> +		if (xdr_stream_decode_u64(&xdr, &bex.len)) {
> +			dprintk("%s: failed to decode length for entry %u\n",
> +				__func__, i);
> +			goto fail;
> +		}
>  		if (bex.len & (block_size - 1)) {
>  			dprintk("%s: unaligned length 0x%llx\n",
>  				__func__, bex.foff);
>  			goto fail;
>  		}
> -		p = xdr_decode_hyper(p, &bex.soff);
> +
> +		if (xdr_stream_decode_u64(&xdr, &bex.soff)) {
> +			dprintk("%s: failed to decode soffset for entry %u\n",
> +				__func__, i);
> +			goto fail;
> +		}
>  		if (bex.soff & (block_size - 1)) {
>  			dprintk("%s: unaligned disk offset 0x%llx\n",
>  				__func__, bex.soff);
>  			goto fail;
>  		}
> -		bex.es = be32_to_cpup(p++);
> +
> +		if (xdr_stream_decode_u32(&xdr, &bex.es)) {
> +			dprintk("%s: failed to decode estate for entry %u\n",
> +				__func__, i);
> +			goto fail;
> +		}
>  		if (bex.es != PNFS_BLOCK_READWRITE_DATA) {
>  			dprintk("%s: incorrect extent state %d\n",
>  				__func__, bex.es);
> @@ -185,18 +211,23 @@ nfsd4_block_decode_layoutupdate(__be32 *p, u32 len, struct iomap **iomapp,
>  }
>  
>  int
> -nfsd4_scsi_decode_layoutupdate(__be32 *p, u32 len, struct iomap **iomapp,
> +nfsd4_scsi_decode_layoutupdate(struct xdr_buf *buf, struct iomap **iomapp,
>  		u32 block_size)
>  {
>  	struct iomap *iomaps;
> -	u32 nr_iomaps, expected, i;
> +	u32 nr_iomaps, expected, len, i;
> +	struct xdr_stream xdr;
> +	char scratch[sizeof(struct pnfs_block_range)];
>  
> -	if (len < sizeof(u32)) {
> -		dprintk("%s: extent array too small: %u\n", __func__, len);
> +	xdr_init_decode(&xdr, buf, buf->head[0].iov_base, NULL);
> +	xdr_set_scratch_buffer(&xdr, scratch, sizeof(scratch));
> +
> +	if (xdr_stream_decode_u32(&xdr, &nr_iomaps)) {
> +		dprintk("%s: failed to decode extent array size\n", __func__);
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> -	nr_iomaps = be32_to_cpup(p++);
> +	len = sizeof(__be32) + xdr_stream_remaining(&xdr);
>  	expected = sizeof(__be32) + nr_iomaps * PNFS_SCSI_RANGE_SIZE;
>  	if (len != expected) {
>  		dprintk("%s: extent array size mismatch: %u/%u\n",
> @@ -213,14 +244,22 @@ nfsd4_scsi_decode_layoutupdate(__be32 *p, u32 len, struct iomap **iomapp,
>  	for (i = 0; i < nr_iomaps; i++) {
>  		u64 val;
>  
> -		p = xdr_decode_hyper(p, &val);
> +		if (xdr_stream_decode_u64(&xdr, &val)) {
> +			dprintk("%s: failed to decode offset for entry %u\n",
> +				__func__, i);
> +			goto fail;
> +		}
>  		if (val & (block_size - 1)) {
>  			dprintk("%s: unaligned offset 0x%llx\n", __func__, val);
>  			goto fail;
>  		}
>  		iomaps[i].offset = val;
>  
> -		p = xdr_decode_hyper(p, &val);
> +		if (xdr_stream_decode_u64(&xdr, &val)) {
> +			dprintk("%s: failed to decode length for entry %u\n",
> +				__func__, i);
> +			goto fail;
> +		}
>  		if (val & (block_size - 1)) {
>  			dprintk("%s: unaligned length 0x%llx\n", __func__, val);
>  			goto fail;
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/blocklayoutxdr.h b/fs/nfsd/blocklayoutxdr.h
> index 4e28ac8f1127..6e603cfec0a7 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/blocklayoutxdr.h
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/blocklayoutxdr.h
> @@ -54,9 +54,9 @@ __be32 nfsd4_block_encode_getdeviceinfo(struct xdr_stream *xdr,
>  		const struct nfsd4_getdeviceinfo *gdp);
>  __be32 nfsd4_block_encode_layoutget(struct xdr_stream *xdr,
>  		const struct nfsd4_layoutget *lgp);
> -int nfsd4_block_decode_layoutupdate(__be32 *p, u32 len, struct iomap **iomapp,
> -		u32 block_size);
> -int nfsd4_scsi_decode_layoutupdate(__be32 *p, u32 len, struct iomap **iomapp,
> -		u32 block_size);
> +int nfsd4_block_decode_layoutupdate(struct xdr_buf *buf,
> +		struct iomap **iomapp, u32 block_size);
> +int nfsd4_scsi_decode_layoutupdate(struct xdr_buf *buf,
> +		struct iomap **iomapp, u32 block_size);
>  
>  #endif /* _NFSD_BLOCKLAYOUTXDR_H */
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
> index 3afcdbed6e14..659e60b85d5f 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
> @@ -604,6 +604,8 @@ static __be32
>  nfsd4_decode_layoutupdate4(struct nfsd4_compoundargs *argp,
>  			   struct nfsd4_layoutcommit *lcp)
>  {
> +	u32 len;
> +
>  	if (xdr_stream_decode_u32(argp->xdr, &lcp->lc_layout_type) < 0)
>  		return nfserr_bad_xdr;
>  	if (lcp->lc_layout_type < LAYOUT_NFSV4_1_FILES)
> @@ -611,13 +613,10 @@ nfsd4_decode_layoutupdate4(struct nfsd4_compoundargs *argp,
>  	if (lcp->lc_layout_type >= LAYOUT_TYPE_MAX)
>  		return nfserr_bad_xdr;
>  
> -	if (xdr_stream_decode_u32(argp->xdr, &lcp->lc_up_len) < 0)
> +	if (xdr_stream_decode_u32(argp->xdr, &len) < 0)
> +		return nfserr_bad_xdr;
> +	if (!xdr_stream_subsegment(argp->xdr, &lcp->lc_up_layout, len))
>  		return nfserr_bad_xdr;

The layout is effectively an opaque payload at this point, so using
xdr_stream_subsegment() makes sense to me.


> -	if (lcp->lc_up_len > 0) {
> -		lcp->lc_up_layout = xdr_inline_decode(argp->xdr, lcp->lc_up_len);
> -		if (!lcp->lc_up_layout)
> -			return nfserr_bad_xdr;
> -	}
>  
>  	return nfs_ok;
>  }
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/xdr4.h b/fs/nfsd/xdr4.h
> index aa2a356da784..02887029a81c 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/xdr4.h
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/xdr4.h
> @@ -630,8 +630,7 @@ struct nfsd4_layoutcommit {
>  	u64			lc_last_wr;	/* request */
>  	struct timespec64	lc_mtime;	/* request */
>  	u32			lc_layout_type;	/* request */
> -	u32			lc_up_len;	/* layout length */
> -	void			*lc_up_layout;	/* decoded by callback */
> +	struct xdr_buf		lc_up_layout;	/* decoded by callback */
>  	bool			lc_size_chg;	/* response */
>  	u64			lc_newsize;	/* response */
>  };


-- 
Chuck Lever

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ