lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8e3b3a63-9060-4bf9-ad85-3ef5f5d541db@lucifer.local>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 19:52:26 +0100
From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
To: Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Barry Song <v-songbaohua@...o.com>,
        "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
        Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@...gle.com>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Tangquan Zheng <zhengtangquan@...o.com>,
        Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] mm: madvise: use per_vma lock for MADV_FREE

On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 05:59:20PM +1200, Barry Song wrote:
> From: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@...o.com>
>
> MADV_FREE is another option, besides MADV_DONTNEED, for dynamic memory
> freeing in user-space native or Java heap memory management. For example,
> jemalloc can be configured to use MADV_FREE, and recent versions of the
> Android Java heap have also increasingly adopted MADV_FREE. Supporting
> per-VMA locking for MADV_FREE thus appears increasingly necessary.
>
> We have replaced walk_page_range() with walk_page_range_vma(). Along with
> the proposed madvise_lock_mode by Lorenzo, the necessary infrastructure is
> now in place to begin exploring per-VMA locking support for MADV_FREE and
> potentially other madvise using walk_page_range_vma().

Thanks :)

>
> This patch adds support for the PGWALK_VMA_RDLOCK walk_lock mode in
> walk_page_range_vma(), and leverages madvise_lock_mode from
> madv_behavior to select the appropriate walk_lock—either mmap_lock or
> per-VMA lock—based on the context.
>
> To ensure thread safety, madvise_free_walk_ops is now defined as a stack
> variable instead of a global constant.

A nit but I'd add 'because we now dynamically update the walk_ops->walk_lock
field we must make sure this is thread safe' or something like this to clarify
the need for this

Did we not have to worry about this before I guess because the mmap lock would
exclude other threads?

An aside, but I wonder if we have this implicit assumption elsewhere that VMA
locks defeat... hm :)

>
> Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
> Cc: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
> Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
> Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@...gle.com>
> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
> Cc: Tangquan Zheng <zhengtangquan@...o.com>
> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
> Signed-off-by: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@...o.com>

Looks good to me, kinda neat how the previous work for the MADV_DONTNEED under
VMA lock stuff made this pretty straightforward :)

So:

Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>

> ---
>  include/linux/pagewalk.h |  2 ++
>  mm/madvise.c             | 20 ++++++++++++++------
>  mm/pagewalk.c            |  6 ++++++
>  3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/pagewalk.h b/include/linux/pagewalk.h
> index 9700a29f8afb..a4afa64ef0ab 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pagewalk.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pagewalk.h
> @@ -14,6 +14,8 @@ enum page_walk_lock {
>  	PGWALK_WRLOCK = 1,
>  	/* vma is expected to be already write-locked during the walk */
>  	PGWALK_WRLOCK_VERIFY = 2,
> +	/* vma is expected to be already read-locked during the walk */
> +	PGWALK_VMA_RDLOCK_VERIFY = 3,
>  };
>
>  /**
> diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
> index 381eedde8f6d..23d58eb31c8f 100644
> --- a/mm/madvise.c
> +++ b/mm/madvise.c
> @@ -775,10 +775,14 @@ static int madvise_free_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>
> -static const struct mm_walk_ops madvise_free_walk_ops = {
> -	.pmd_entry		= madvise_free_pte_range,
> -	.walk_lock		= PGWALK_RDLOCK,
> -};
> +static inline enum page_walk_lock get_walk_lock(enum madvise_lock_mode mode)
> +{
> +	/* Other modes don't require fixing up the walk_lock. */
> +	VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(mode != MADVISE_VMA_READ_LOCK &&
> +			mode != MADVISE_MMAP_READ_LOCK);

I find this a bit hard to parse...

> +	return mode == MADVISE_VMA_READ_LOCK ?
> +			PGWALK_VMA_RDLOCK_VERIFY : PGWALK_RDLOCK;

...might be better as something like:

	switch (mode) {
		case MADVISE_VMA_READ_LOCK:
			return PGWALK_VMA_RDLOCK_VERIFY;
		case MADVISE_MMAP_READ_LOCK:
			return PGWALK_RDLOCK;
		default:
			/* Invalid. */
			WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
			return PGWALK_RDLOCK;
	}

> +}
>
>  static int madvise_free_single_vma(struct madvise_behavior *madv_behavior,
>  			struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> @@ -787,6 +791,9 @@ static int madvise_free_single_vma(struct madvise_behavior *madv_behavior,
>  	struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
>  	struct mmu_notifier_range range;
>  	struct mmu_gather *tlb = madv_behavior->tlb;
> +	struct mm_walk_ops walk_ops = {
> +		.pmd_entry		= madvise_free_pte_range,
> +	};
>
>  	/* MADV_FREE works for only anon vma at the moment */
>  	if (!vma_is_anonymous(vma))
> @@ -806,8 +813,9 @@ static int madvise_free_single_vma(struct madvise_behavior *madv_behavior,
>
>  	mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(&range);
>  	tlb_start_vma(tlb, vma);
> +	walk_ops.walk_lock = get_walk_lock(madv_behavior->lock_mode);
>  	walk_page_range_vma(vma, range.start, range.end,
> -			&madvise_free_walk_ops, tlb);
> +			&walk_ops, tlb);
>  	tlb_end_vma(tlb, vma);
>  	mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(&range);
>  	return 0;
> @@ -1653,7 +1661,6 @@ static enum madvise_lock_mode get_lock_mode(struct madvise_behavior *madv_behavi
>  	case MADV_WILLNEED:
>  	case MADV_COLD:
>  	case MADV_PAGEOUT:
> -	case MADV_FREE:
>  	case MADV_POPULATE_READ:
>  	case MADV_POPULATE_WRITE:
>  	case MADV_COLLAPSE:
> @@ -1662,6 +1669,7 @@ static enum madvise_lock_mode get_lock_mode(struct madvise_behavior *madv_behavi
>  		return MADVISE_MMAP_READ_LOCK;
>  	case MADV_DONTNEED:
>  	case MADV_DONTNEED_LOCKED:
> +	case MADV_FREE:
>  		return MADVISE_VMA_READ_LOCK;
>  	default:
>  		return MADVISE_MMAP_WRITE_LOCK;
> diff --git a/mm/pagewalk.c b/mm/pagewalk.c
> index e478777c86e1..c984aacc5552 100644
> --- a/mm/pagewalk.c
> +++ b/mm/pagewalk.c
> @@ -420,6 +420,9 @@ static int __walk_page_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
>  static inline void process_mm_walk_lock(struct mm_struct *mm,
>  					enum page_walk_lock walk_lock)
>  {
> +	if (walk_lock == PGWALK_VMA_RDLOCK_VERIFY)
> +		return;
> +
>  	if (walk_lock == PGWALK_RDLOCK)
>  		mmap_assert_locked(mm);
>  	else
> @@ -437,6 +440,9 @@ static inline void process_vma_walk_lock(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  	case PGWALK_WRLOCK_VERIFY:
>  		vma_assert_write_locked(vma);
>  		break;
> +	case PGWALK_VMA_RDLOCK_VERIFY:
> +		vma_assert_locked(vma);
> +		break;
>  	case PGWALK_RDLOCK:
>  		/* PGWALK_RDLOCK is handled by process_mm_walk_lock */
>  		break;
> --
> 2.39.3 (Apple Git-146)
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ