[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4bc63cf3-29a4-4a64-be65-30f7bd55e31c@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 15:33:32 -0400
From: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@...dia.com>
To: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@...il.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Neeraj upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@....com>
Cc: RCU <rcu@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@...y.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] rcu: Return early if callback is not specified
On 6/10/2025 1:34 PM, Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) wrote:
> Currently the call_rcu() API does not check whether a callback
> pointer is NULL. If NULL is passed, rcu_core() will try to invoke
> it, resulting in NULL pointer dereference and a kernel crash.
>
> To prevent this and improve debuggability, this patch adds a check
> for NULL and emits a kernel stack trace to help identify a faulty
> caller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@...dia.com>
I will add this first one (only this one since we're discussing the others) to a
new rcu/fixes-for-6.16 branch, but let me know if any objections.
Will push that branch out during -rc2 or -rc3 after sufficient testing.
thanks,
- Joel
> ---
> kernel/rcu/tree.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> index e8a4b720d7d2..14d4499c6fc3 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> @@ -3072,6 +3072,10 @@ __call_rcu_common(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func, bool lazy_in)
> /* Misaligned rcu_head! */
> WARN_ON_ONCE((unsigned long)head & (sizeof(void *) - 1));
>
> + /* Avoid NULL dereference if callback is NULL. */
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!func))
> + return;
> +
> if (debug_rcu_head_queue(head)) {
> /*
> * Probable double call_rcu(), so leak the callback.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists