[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250610140228.7836d333cea973a8171686fb@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 14:02:28 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@...itsu.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ying Huang
<huang.ying.caritas@...il.com>, Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>, Donet
Tom <donettom@...ux.ibm.com>, Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/memory-tier: Fix abstract distance calculation
overflow
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 14:27:51 +0800 Li Zhijian <lizhijian@...itsu.com> wrote:
> In mt_perf_to_adistance(), the calculation of abstract distance (adist)
> involves multiplying several int values including MEMTIER_ADISTANCE_DRAM.
> ```
> *adist = MEMTIER_ADISTANCE_DRAM *
> (perf->read_latency + perf->write_latency) /
> (default_dram_perf.read_latency + default_dram_perf.write_latency) *
> (default_dram_perf.read_bandwidth + default_dram_perf.write_bandwidth) /
> (perf->read_bandwidth + perf->write_bandwidth);
> ```
> Since these values can be large, the multiplication may exceed the maximum
> value of an int (INT_MAX) and overflow (Our platform did), leading to an
> incorrect adist.
>
> Change MEMTIER_ADISTANCE_DRAM to be a long constant by writing it with the
> 'L' suffix. This prevents the overflow because the multiplication will then
> be done in the long type which has a larger range.
Thanks. The changelog doesn't describe the userspace-visible effects
of this. Please always include this info.
I'll assume "minor" and it's been this way for a while so I'll add a
cc:stable to this change and shall queue it for 6.17-rc1, so it will be
backported into 6.17.x and earlier kernels at a later time.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists