[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1ec55f0b-991f-4ea0-869e-5fc0be719c8f@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 12:37:56 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt
<palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>, Rik van Riel
<riel@...riel.com>, "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mm: Remove arch_flush_tlb_batched_pending() arch
helper
On 09.06.25 12:31, Ryan Roberts wrote:
> Since commit 4b634918384c ("arm64/mm: Close theoretical race where stale
> TLB entry remains valid"), all arches that use tlbbatch for reclaim
> (arm64, riscv, x86) implement arch_flush_tlb_batched_pending() with a
> flush_tlb_mm().
>
> So let's simplify by removing the unnecessary abstraction and doing the
> flush_tlb_mm() directly in flush_tlb_batched_pending(). This effectively
> reverts commit db6c1f6f236d ("mm/tlbbatch: introduce
> arch_flush_tlb_batched_pending()").
>
> Suggested-by: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>
> ---
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists