[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAC_iWjJQ7k2drnPZh8bjaLvVa9rd2mLw7_=L3hV3scnWBQBvRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 14:11:54 +0300
From: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>
To: Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com>
Cc: willy@...radead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, kernel_team@...ynix.com, kuba@...nel.org,
almasrymina@...gle.com, harry.yoo@...cle.com, hawk@...nel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, davem@...emloft.net, john.fastabend@...il.com,
andrew+netdev@...n.ch, asml.silence@...il.com, toke@...hat.com,
tariqt@...dia.com, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, saeedm@...dia.com,
leon@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, david@...hat.com,
lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com, Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, vbabka@...e.cz,
rppt@...nel.org, surenb@...gle.com, mhocko@...e.com, horms@...nel.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, vishal.moola@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/9] page_pool: rename __page_pool_release_page_dma()
to __page_pool_release_netmem_dma()
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 at 07:32, Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com> wrote:
>
> Now that __page_pool_release_page_dma() is for releasing netmem, not
> struct page, rename it to __page_pool_release_netmem_dma() to reflect
> what it does.
>
> Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com>
> Reviewed-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>
> net/core/page_pool.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/page_pool.c b/net/core/page_pool.c
> index 460d11a31fbc..8d44d1abfaef 100644
> --- a/net/core/page_pool.c
> +++ b/net/core/page_pool.c
> @@ -673,8 +673,8 @@ void page_pool_clear_pp_info(netmem_ref netmem)
> netmem_set_pp(netmem, NULL);
> }
>
> -static __always_inline void __page_pool_release_page_dma(struct page_pool *pool,
> - netmem_ref netmem)
> +static __always_inline void __page_pool_release_netmem_dma(struct page_pool *pool,
> + netmem_ref netmem)
> {
> struct page *old, *page = netmem_to_page(netmem);
> unsigned long id;
> @@ -721,7 +721,7 @@ static void page_pool_return_netmem(struct page_pool *pool, netmem_ref netmem)
> if (static_branch_unlikely(&page_pool_mem_providers) && pool->mp_ops)
> put = pool->mp_ops->release_netmem(pool, netmem);
> else
> - __page_pool_release_page_dma(pool, netmem);
> + __page_pool_release_netmem_dma(pool, netmem);
>
> /* This may be the last page returned, releasing the pool, so
> * it is not safe to reference pool afterwards.
> @@ -1139,7 +1139,7 @@ static void page_pool_scrub(struct page_pool *pool)
> }
>
> xa_for_each(&pool->dma_mapped, id, ptr)
> - __page_pool_release_page_dma(pool, page_to_netmem(ptr));
> + __page_pool_release_netmem_dma(pool, page_to_netmem((struct page *)ptr));
> }
>
> /* No more consumers should exist, but producers could still
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists