linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] dt-bindings: arm: aspeed: add Meta Ventura board

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFGtgY35x=QdmvUrvBTZNDeaV4iMefznzc7d-RD6aHj8LgUaVw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 20:16:02 +0800
From: 徐傑生 <jasonhell19@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, joel@....id.au, 
	andrew@...econstruct.com.au, patrick@...cx.xyz, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yang.chen@...ntatw.com, jerry.lin@...ntatw.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] dt-bindings: arm: aspeed: add Meta Ventura board

Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> 於 2025年6月6日 週五 下午2:52寫道：
>
> On 06/06/2025 04:52, Jason Hsu wrote:
> > Document the new compatibles used on Meta Ventura.
>
> This is not what is happening here.
>
> > Add subject prefix for the patch.
>
> No clue what is "subject prefix" for a patch.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Hsu <jasonhell19@...il.com>
>
> Please use subject prefixes matching the subsystem. You can get them for
> example with `git log --oneline -- DIRECTORY_OR_FILE` on the directory
> your patch is touching. For bindings, the preferred subjects are
> explained here:
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.html#i-for-patch-submitters
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
>>
>Appreciate the feedback.
>
>> No clue what is "subject prefix" for a patch.
>
>v8 updated the commit message to more accurately describe the changes,
>and removed the unclear note about the "subject prefix".
>
>
>Best regards,
>Jason
>
>