[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <oiwsbn4bo566rzxgcjkelufp657iog2hxiqthxow663cqh44dk@lev4vkh2emjb>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 06:56:48 -0700
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>
To: JP Kobryn <inwardvessel@...il.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>, Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>, Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>,
Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>, Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@...ux.dev>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Meta kernel team <kernel-team@...a.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] cgroup: make css_rstat_updated nmi safe
On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 10:23:51PM -0700, JP Kobryn wrote:
>
> The subsystem per-cpu locks were used to synchronize updater and flusher
> on a given cpu. Since you no longer use them on the updater side, it
> seems these locks can be removed altogether.
Indeed you are right, thanks for the suggestion.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists