[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id:
<174965463225.3362912.890575326348538837.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 15:10:32 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@...ux.dev>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, borisp@...dia.com, john.fastabend@...il.com,
kuba@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
horms@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
martin.lau@...ux.dev, eddyz87@...il.com, song@...nel.org,
yonghong.song@...ux.dev, kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...ichev.me,
haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, mykolal@...com, shuah@...nel.org,
isolodrai@...a.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/2] bpf,ktls: Fix data corruption caused by
using
bpf_msg_pop_data() in ktls
Hello:
This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (net)
by Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 10:08:51 +0800 you wrote:
> Cong reported an issue where running 'test_sockmap' in the current
> bpf-next tree results in an error [1].
>
> The specific test case that triggered the error is a combined test
> involving ktls and bpf_msg_pop_data().
>
> Root Cause:
> When sending plaintext data, we initially calculated the corresponding
> ciphertext length. However, if we later reduced the plaintext data length
> via socket policy, we failed to recalculate the ciphertext length.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next,v2,1/2] bpf,ktls: Fix data corruption when using bpf_msg_pop_data() in ktls
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/178f6a5c8cb3
- [bpf-next,v2,2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test to cover ktls with bpf_msg_pop_data
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/f1c025773f25
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists