linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] spi: dt-bindings: mediatek,spi-mt65xx: Add support for MT6991/MT8196 SPI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <174965661418.52462.1962051636237778809.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 16:43:34 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
Cc: robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, 
 matthias.bgg@...il.com, leilk.liu@...iatek.com, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, 
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, 
 kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] spi: dt-bindings: mediatek,spi-mt65xx: Add support
 for MT6991/MT8196 SPI

On Wed, 11 Jun 2025 13:07:46 +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Add support for the SPI IPM controller found on MediaTek's MT6991
> (Dimensity) and MT8196 (Kompanio) SoCs, with both having the same
> controller IP, hence being fully compatible with each other.
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/2] spi: dt-bindings: mediatek,spi-mt65xx: Add support for MT6991/MT8196 SPI
      commit: 414145b4cf6c64831aa497f0ec6cc1ca2d76c1d2
[2/2] spi: spi-mt65xx: Add support for MT6991 Dimensity 9400 SPI IPM
      commit: 6cafcc53eb5fffd9b9bdfde700bb9bad21e98ed3

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark