[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250611162508.85149-1-iorlov@amazon.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 16:25:24 +0000
From: "Orlov, Ivan" <iorlov@...zon.co.uk>
To: "peterhuewe@....de" <peterhuewe@....de>, "jarkko@...nel.org"
<jarkko@...nel.org>
CC: "Orlov, Ivan" <iorlov@...zon.co.uk>, "jgg@...pe.ca" <jgg@...pe.ca>,
"linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org" <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Woodhouse,
David" <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>
Subject: [PATCH] tpm: Fix the timeout & use ktime
The current implementation of timeout detection works in the following
way:
1. Read completion status. If completed, return the data
2. Sleep for some time (usleep_range)
3. Check for timeout using current jiffies value. Return an error if
timed out
4. Goto 1
usleep_range doesn't guarantee it's always going to wake up strictly in
(min, max) range, so such a situation is possible:
1. Driver reads completion status. No completion yet
2. Process sleeps indefinitely. In the meantime, TPM responds
3. We check for timeout without checking for the completion again.
Result is lost.
Such a situation also happens for the guest VMs: if vCPU goes to sleep
and doesn't get scheduled for some time, the guest TPM driver will
timeout instantly after waking up without checking for the completion
(which may already be in place).
Instead, perform the check in the following way:
1. Read the current timestamp
2. Read the completion status. If completed, return the result
3. Sleep
4. Check if the timestamp read at step 1 exceeds the timeout. Return
an error if it does
5. Goto 1
Also, use ktime instead of jiffes as a more reliable and precise timing
source.
Signed-off-by: Ivan Orlov <iorlov@...zon.com>
---
drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
index 8d7e4da6ed53..959330212a16 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
@@ -88,7 +88,8 @@ static ssize_t tpm_try_transmit(struct tpm_chip *chip, void *buf, size_t bufsiz)
int rc;
ssize_t len = 0;
u32 count, ordinal;
- unsigned long stop;
+ ktime_t timeout, curr_time;
+ unsigned int ord_dur_us;
if (bufsiz < TPM_HEADER_SIZE)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -126,8 +127,16 @@ static ssize_t tpm_try_transmit(struct tpm_chip *chip, void *buf, size_t bufsiz)
if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_IRQ)
goto out_recv;
- stop = jiffies + tpm_calc_ordinal_duration(chip, ordinal);
+ ord_dur_us = jiffies_to_usecs(tpm_calc_ordinal_duration(chip, ordinal));
+ timeout = ktime_add_us(ktime_get(), ord_dur_us);
do {
+ /*
+ * Save the time of the completion check. This way even if CPU
+ * goes to sleep indefinitely on tpm_sleep, the driver will
+ * check for completion one more time instead of timing out
+ * instantly after waking up.
+ */
+ curr_time = ktime_get();
u8 status = tpm_chip_status(chip);
if ((status & chip->ops->req_complete_mask) ==
chip->ops->req_complete_val)
@@ -140,7 +149,7 @@ static ssize_t tpm_try_transmit(struct tpm_chip *chip, void *buf, size_t bufsiz)
tpm_msleep(TPM_TIMEOUT_POLL);
rmb();
- } while (time_before(jiffies, stop));
+ } while (ktime_before(curr_time, timeout));
tpm_chip_cancel(chip);
dev_err(&chip->dev, "Operation Timed out\n");
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists