[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55bba029-9243-439d-9f1c-985f48ad2ec8@baylibre.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 13:40:25 -0500
From: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] net: mdio: mux-gpio: use
gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep
On 6/11/25 1:25 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 01:11:36PM -0500, David Lechner wrote:
>> Reduce verbosity by using gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep() instead of
>> gpiod_set_array_value_cansleep().
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
>> ---
>> This is a resend of a patch from the series "[PATCH v3 00/15] gpiolib:
>> add gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep" [1].
>>
>> This patch never got acked so didn't go picked up with the rest of that
>> series. The dependency has been in mainline since v6.15-rc1 so this
>> patch can now be applied independently.
>
> It is not surprising it did not get picked up when it is mixed in with
> a lot of other subsystems. Please always post a patchset per
> subsystem.
>
> This also appears to be version 4.
>
> Since you did not annotate the Subject: line with the tree this is
> for, i'm not sure the CI system will accept it an run the tests.
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20250611-net-mdio-mux-gpio-use-gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep-v1-1-6eb5281f1b41@baylibre.com/
>
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/maintainer-netdev.html
>
> Andrew
OK, I will try again tomorrow with [PATCH net-next v5].
Powered by blists - more mailing lists