linux-kernel - [PATCH] gpio: virtuser: use gpiod_multi_set_value

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20250611-gpio-virtuser-use-gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep-v1-1-43b4adf6c807@baylibre.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 13:50:26 -0500
From: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, 
 Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
 David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
Subject: [PATCH] gpio: virtuser: use gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep()

Reduce verbosity by using gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep() instead of
gpiod_set_array_value_cansleep().

Signed-off-by: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-virtuser.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-virtuser.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-virtuser.c
index eab6726953b4118dc0d72c2e37daeb9629040d11..a10eab7d2617e40cefb5f08e1211e9cb33035d0d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-virtuser.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-virtuser.c
@@ -215,9 +215,7 @@ static int gpio_virtuser_set_array_value(struct gpio_descs *descs,
 	struct gpio_virtuser_irq_work_context ctx;
 
 	if (!atomic)
-		return gpiod_set_array_value_cansleep(descs->ndescs,
-						      descs->desc,
-						      descs->info, values);
+		return gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep(descs, values);
 
 	gpio_virtuser_init_irq_work_context(&ctx);
 	ctx.work = IRQ_WORK_INIT_HARD(gpio_virtuser_set_value_array_atomic);

---
base-commit: 19a60293b9925080d97f22f122aca3fc46dadaf9
change-id: 20250611-gpio-virtuser-use-gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep-3d0480077870

Best regards,
-- 
David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>