[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250611213557.294358-2-seanjc@google.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 14:35:40 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 01/18] KVM: x86: Trigger I/O APIC route rescan in kvm_arch_irq_routing_update()
Trigger the I/O APIC route rescan that's performed for a split IRQ chip
after userspace updates IRQ routes in kvm_arch_irq_routing_update(), i.e.
before dropping kvm->irq_lock. Calling kvm_make_all_cpus_request() under
a mutex is perfectly safe, and the smp_wmb()+smp_mb__after_atomic() pair
in __kvm_make_request()+kvm_check_request() ensures the new routing is
visible to vCPUs prior to the request being visible to vCPUs.
In all likelihood, commit b053b2aef25d ("KVM: x86: Add EOI exit bitmap
inference") somewhat arbitrarily made the request outside of irq_lock to
avoid holding irq_lock any longer than is strictly necessary. And then
commit abdb080f7ac8 ("kvm/irqchip: kvm_arch_irq_routing_update renaming
split") took the easy route of adding another arch hook instead of risking
a functional change.
Note, the call to synchronize_srcu_expedited() does NOT provide ordering
guarantees with respect to vCPUs scanning the new routing; as above, the
request infrastructure provides the necessary ordering. I.e. there's no
need to wait for kvm_scan_ioapic_routes() to complete if it's actively
running, because regardless of whether it grabs the old or new table, the
vCPU will have another KVM_REQ_SCAN_IOAPIC pending, i.e. will rescan again
and see the new mappings.
Acked-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/irq_comm.c | 10 +++-------
include/linux/kvm_host.h | 4 ----
virt/kvm/irqchip.c | 2 --
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/irq_comm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/irq_comm.c
index d6d792b5d1bd..e2ae62ff9cc2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/irq_comm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/irq_comm.c
@@ -395,13 +395,6 @@ int kvm_setup_default_irq_routing(struct kvm *kvm)
ARRAY_SIZE(default_routing), 0);
}
-void kvm_arch_post_irq_routing_update(struct kvm *kvm)
-{
- if (!irqchip_split(kvm))
- return;
- kvm_make_scan_ioapic_request(kvm);
-}
-
void kvm_scan_ioapic_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 dest_id, u16 dest_mode,
u8 vector, unsigned long *ioapic_handled_vectors)
{
@@ -466,4 +459,7 @@ void kvm_arch_irq_routing_update(struct kvm *kvm)
#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_HYPERV
kvm_hv_irq_routing_update(kvm);
#endif
+
+ if (irqchip_split(kvm))
+ kvm_make_scan_ioapic_request(kvm);
}
diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
index 3bde4fb5c6aa..9461517b4e62 100644
--- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
+++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
@@ -1024,14 +1024,10 @@ void vcpu_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
#ifdef __KVM_HAVE_IOAPIC
void kvm_arch_post_irq_ack_notifier_list_update(struct kvm *kvm);
-void kvm_arch_post_irq_routing_update(struct kvm *kvm);
#else
static inline void kvm_arch_post_irq_ack_notifier_list_update(struct kvm *kvm)
{
}
-static inline void kvm_arch_post_irq_routing_update(struct kvm *kvm)
-{
-}
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQCHIP
diff --git a/virt/kvm/irqchip.c b/virt/kvm/irqchip.c
index 162d8ed889f2..6ccabfd32287 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/irqchip.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/irqchip.c
@@ -222,8 +222,6 @@ int kvm_set_irq_routing(struct kvm *kvm,
kvm_arch_irq_routing_update(kvm);
mutex_unlock(&kvm->irq_lock);
- kvm_arch_post_irq_routing_update(kvm);
-
synchronize_srcu_expedited(&kvm->irq_srcu);
new = old;
--
2.50.0.rc1.591.g9c95f17f64-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists