[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250611224604.313496-38-seanjc@google.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 15:45:39 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>, Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sairaj Kodilkar <sarunkod@....com>, Vasant Hegde <vasant.hegde@....com>,
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>, Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@...cle.com>,
Francesco Lavra <francescolavra.fl@...il.com>, David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 36/62] KVM: x86: Don't update IRTE entries when old and new
routes were !MSI
Skip the entirety of IRTE updates on a GSI routing change if neither the
old nor the new routing is for an MSI, i.e. if the neither routing setup
allows for posting to a vCPU. If the IRTE isn't already host controlled,
KVM has bigger problems.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/irq.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/irq.c b/arch/x86/kvm/irq.c
index 43e85ebc0d5b..4119c1e880e7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/irq.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/irq.c
@@ -618,6 +618,10 @@ void kvm_arch_update_irqfd_routing(struct kvm_kernel_irqfd *irqfd,
struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *old,
struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *new)
{
+ if (new->type != KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_MSI &&
+ old->type != KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_MSI)
+ return;
+
if (old->type == KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_MSI &&
new->type == KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_MSI &&
!memcmp(&old->msi, &new->msi, sizeof(new->msi)))
--
2.50.0.rc1.591.g9c95f17f64-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists