[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3nloqn2gjfn7rkaqsebb5wp4zikgwa7tfslvmv53bt4unuvu7d@p3q6qfskvhmo>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 16:12:14 -0700
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
To: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>, live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, laokz <laokz@...mail.com>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@...e.com>, Weinan Liu <wnliu@...gle.com>,
Fazla Mehrab <a.mehrab@...edance.com>, Chen Zhongjin <chenzhongjin@...wei.com>,
Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 59/62] livepatch/klp-build: Introduce klp-build script
for generating livepatch modules
On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 05:44:23PM -0400, Joe Lawrence wrote:
> On 5/9/25 4:17 PM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > +revert_patches() {
> > + local extra_args=("$@")
> > + local patches=("${APPLIED_PATCHES[@]}")
> > +
> > + for (( i=${#patches[@]}-1 ; i>=0 ; i-- )) ; do
> > + revert_patch "${patches[$i]}" "${extra_args[@]}"
> > + done
> > +
> > + APPLIED_PATCHES=()
> > +
> > + # Make sure git actually sees the patches have been reverted.
> > + [[ -d "$SRC/.git" ]] && (cd "$SRC" && git update-index -q --refresh)
> > +}
>
> < warning: testing entropy field fully engaged :D >
>
> Minor usability nit: I had run `klp-build --help` while inside a VM that
> didn't seem to have r/w access to .git/. Since the cleanup code is
> called unconditionally, it gave me a strange error when running this
> `git update-index` when I never supplied any patches to operate on. I
> just wanted to see the usage.
>
> Could this git update-index be made conditional?
>
> if (( ${#APPLIED_PATCHES[@]} > 0 )); then
> ([[ -d "$SRC/.git" ]] && cd "$SRC" && git update-index -q --refresh)
> APPLIED_PATCHES=()
> fi
>
> Another way to find yourself in this function is to move .git/ out of
> the way. In that case, since it's the last line of revert_patches(), I
> think the failure of [[ -d "$SRC/.git" ]] causes the script to
> immediately exit:
>
> - for foo.patch, at the validate_patches() -> revert_patches() call
> - for --help, at the cleanup() -> revert_patches() call
>
> So if you don't like the conditional change above, should
> revert_patches() end with `true` to eat the [[ -d "$SRC/.git" ]] status?
> Or does that interfere with other calls to that function throughout the
> script?
>
> FWIW, with either adjustment, the script seems happy to operate on a
> plain ol' kernel source tree without git.
Hm, revert_patch() already has a call to git_refresh(), so there doesn't
appear to be any point to that extra refresh in revert_patches().
Does this fix?
diff --git a/scripts/livepatch/klp-build b/scripts/livepatch/klp-build
index 7ec07c4079f7..e6dbac89ab03 100755
--- a/scripts/livepatch/klp-build
+++ b/scripts/livepatch/klp-build
@@ -388,9 +388,6 @@ revert_patches() {
done
APPLIED_PATCHES=()
-
- # Make sure git actually sees the patches have been reverted.
- [[ -d "$SRC/.git" ]] && (cd "$SRC" && git update-index -q --refresh)
}
validate_patches() {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists