[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <61e53f55-394d-422f-8600-9035eac40ff4@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 09:13:01 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: George Moussalem <george.moussalem@...look.com>,
Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>, Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@...il.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 1/2] dt-bindings: thermal: qcom-tsens: make ipq5018
tsens standalone compatible
On 11/06/2025 09:06, George Moussalem wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> On 6/11/25 10:51, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 11/06/2025 07:12, George Moussalem via B4 Relay wrote:
>>> From: George Moussalem <george.moussalem@...look.com>
>>>
>>> IPQ5018 tsens should not use qcom,tsens-v1 as fallback since it has no RPM
>>> and, as such, deviates from the standard v1 init routine in the driver.
>>> So let's make qcom,ipq5018-tsens a standalone compatible in the bindings.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: George Moussalem <george.moussalem@...look.com>
>>> ---
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml | 5 ++++-
>>
>> You just added it recently with the fallback (in v9 of this patchset)
>> and now remove it?
>>
>> And what does it mean it has no RPM? How does it affect the driver? Does
>> fallback work or not?
>
> IPQ5018 tsens IP is V1, but since it's got no RPM, it follows a
> different init routine for which VER_1_X_NO_RPM was created just like
> there is one for V2 without RPM, else the driver wouldn't probe. This
> was added as part of:
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/patch/DS7PR19MB8883C5D7974C7735E23923769DCC2@DS7PR19MB8883.namprd19.prod.outlook.com/
>
> Since its introduction, I missed updating the bindings which caused a
> binding issue (as reported by Rob) on the compatible as it expects the
> qcom,tsens-v1 as a fallback. But we can't use that fallback, so that's
> why it needs to be a standalone compatible.
So you need Fixes tag and explain what was buggy in previous patch.
>
>>
>>
>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml
>>> index 0e653bbe9884953b58c4d8569b8d096db47fd54f..73d722bda8adc2c930edfc3373e6011f19c7c491 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml
>>> @@ -36,10 +36,13 @@ properties:
>>> - qcom,msm8974-tsens
>>> - const: qcom,tsens-v0_1
>>>
>>> + - description: v1 of TSENS
>>
>> So that's still v1... I don't understand.
>
> As mentioned, the IP is still v1 but with a different init routine in
> the driver for IP v1 without RPM
OK, just merge it into first enum and drop the description there.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists