[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250611075533.8102A57-hca@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 09:55:33 +0200
From: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Kbuild updates for v6.16-rc1
On Sun, Jun 08, 2025 at 01:41:18AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Kbuild updates for v6.16
>
> - Add support for the EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL_FOR_MODULES() macro, which exports a
> symbol only to specified modules
>
> - Improve ABI handling in gendwarfksyms
>
> - Forcibly link lib-y objects to vmlinux even if CONFIG_MODULES=n
>
> - Add checkers for redundant or missing <linux/export.h> inclusion
As you write in commit a934a57a42f6 ("scripts/misc-check: check missing
#include <linux/export.h> when W=1") this adds now 4000+ extra warnings
for W=1 builds, which makes such builds more or less useless for me.
Also the commit only describes what you want to achieve, but not why.
I can only guess that you want to reduce header dependencies(?).
Don't get me wrong, I can address all of this trivial churn for s390, however
enforcing so many extra warnings to everyone with W=1 builds doesn't look like
the right approach to me.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists