[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <r3mbkrgrok3yh3txuxmddgezsvvpwnackv725ro4wg3xa323xr@36hii2pcv3gp>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 10:32:02 +0000
From: Krzysztof Karas <krzysztof.karas@...el.com>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski
<kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman
<horms@...nel.org>, Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, "Jani
Nikula" <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>, Joonas Lahtinen
<joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...ulin.net>, Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>,
Qasim Ijaz <qasdev00@...il.com>, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 4/9] ref_tracker: add a static classname string to
each ref_tracker_dir
Hi Jeff,
> A later patch in the series will be adding debugfs files for each
> ref_tracker that get created in ref_tracker_dir_init(). The format will
> be "class@%px". The current "name" string can vary between
> ref_tracker_dir objects of the same type, so it's not suitable for this
> purpose.
>
> Add a new "class" string to the ref_tracker dir that describes the
> the type of object (sans any individual info for that object).
>
> Also, in the i915 driver, gate the creation of debugfs files on whether
> the dentry pointer is still set to NULL. CI has shown that the
> ref_tracker_dir can be initialized more than once.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
> ---
Looks good:
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Karas <krzysztof.karas@...el.com>
A side note:
I was wondering if we could improve naming a bit, but I think it
is not worth the effort. Names like "dptun" instead of
"dp_tunnel" and including "wakeref" only in
__intel_wakeref_init() but not in init_intel_runtime_pm_wakeref()
in "intel_runtime_pm" string stand out, but it is quite clear
what these names mean, so I added my r-b.
Best Regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists