[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b3d2a914-77be-4be6-bd43-cfaea7e450c9@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 12:12:50 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Da Xue <da@...re.computer>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>,
Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
Rui Miguel Silva <rmfrfs@...il.com>,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>, Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
Alex Elder <elder@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, greybus-dev@...ts.linaro.org,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC] spi: expand bits_per_word_mask to 64 bits
On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 08:05:15PM -0400, Da Xue wrote:
> Most current controller IP support 64-bit words.
> Update the mask to u64 from u32.
The change looks broadly good, the only concern I have is making sure
that the controllers are individually checked for support and impose any
restrictions they need.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists